Kamala Harris is an abortion and sexual revolution radical
If you think the Biden administration was bad, a Harris administration would be
Last week, President Joe Biden rather expectedly dropped out of the 2024 race, sneakily swapping out primary voters’ choice for his now-Vice President Kamala Harris, who despite an underwhelming first term in the executive branch was warmly welcomed into her forced candidacy by the Democrats’ elite.
While much of the reaction to her candidacy centered around the fact that she is a woman, and a woman of color, this couldn’t be more ironic as her political platform couldn’t be more opposed to women or people of color.
President Joe Biden has inarguably made history as the most politically radical president in U.S. history, but Harris stands a good chance at replacing him here, too.
As pro-life voices emphasize, Harris is a pro-abortion radical who refuses to name a single abortion restriction she supports, meaning she supports the systematic slaughter of unborn babies and the objectification of women of all ethnicities, but especially minority children and their mothers.
“Kamala Harris is determined to impose on all 50 states all-trimester abortion without any limits, even painful late-term abortions in the 7th, 8th, and 9th month of pregnancy. Harris is so committed to abortion that she can’t see anything else – including the developmental stages of children before birth or the real needs of women,” SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser told LifeNews.
“Questioned several times on national television, Harris refused to name a single limit on abortion she supports. She’s even praised efforts to shut down pregnancy care centers which provide real support for women and families in need while becoming the first sitting vice president to campaign at an abortion business,” she continued.
“Kamala Harris has acted as the unofficial Abortion Czar of the Biden-Harris Administration,” Carol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, told LifeNews.com, “She has toured the country pushing unlimited abortion and criticizing protective state laws that support women and their preborn children.”
Abortion is the pinnacle of pro-death progressive policies rooted in the values of the sexual revolution, but over on LifeSiteNews, writer Jonathan Van Maren points out that she is a radical in every other way as well.
Maren believes that Harris is likely the first presidential candidate to feature pronouns in her bio, which is more significant than we may realize.
“This may see innocuous at first glance—especially as we have become used to this sort of virtue-signalling—but Harris’s decision here is deliberate, and it matters,” he explains. “What she is signalling, with the inclusion of her pronouns, is an endorsement of the transgender movement’s view of reality.”
Case in point: Harris first campaign appearance was on RuPaul’s Drag Race.
“I recognize that we have grown used to this sort of thing by now, but again—it is hugely significant,” Maren explains, noting that RuPaul has referred to drag queens as “the Marines of the queer movement,” something which makes quite a lot of sense if you consider the normalization of drag in our contemporary culture.
Before she was known on the national scene, Harris also played LGBT activist in California, refusing to defend a voter-backed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in court, and later officiated the state’s first homosexual wedding.
She is undoubtedly a figurehead of radical progressive values in every single way, but she also has made it this far because our culture has so passively allowed these ideas to flourish, unchecked.
Our battle is not merely political, it is moral and spiritual. None of these issues boil down to individual elections or political battles, but to a culture that has for too long accepted the lie that God is dead and religion is no longer relevant.
God is alive, and the right to life He endows us with are the foundation of our liberties here in the United States. It is to Him that we must appeal to preserve our freedoms and basic regard for life.
The Fundamental Law clearly states that a person is considered legally Born in the womb.
Maxim of Law: “He who is in the womb is considered as born, whenever his benefit is concerned.” Bouv. 151; Black’s, 979.
The serious problem we have is lawyers are not taught the Fundamental Law or Common Law. Which is the law that existed before the Constitutions, yet it's through that law that the Constitutions were enacted and the People gave authority to government. As such the Fundamental Law is just as valid today as it was over 200 years ago when the States and US were founded.